Bridging Foes, Blessing Ties: Riyadh’s role in Indo-Pak peace

Who would have thought when Pakistan first announced its nuclear success that this...

Zelenskyy warns the UN that the AI arms race is already here

UNITED NATIONS: Volodymyr Zelenskyy arrived at the green marble rostrum with the cadence...

Trump’s Tylenol scare in pregnancy falls apart under scrutiny

Global health agencies moved to calm a storm of anxiety among pregnant women...

Google and Qualcomm put Windows on notice with an Android PC plan

MAUI, Hawaii — On a warm evening above the Pacific, Google and Qualcomm...

Weinstein Trial: “PREDATORY” behavior divides Jury

-Advertisement-

Harvey Weinstein’s trial jury hinted on Friday that he had agreed to three of the five charges but remained divided over the two remainings, and the judge asked them to continue their deliberations.

In the early afternoon, jurors at the Manhattan Criminal Court sent magistrate James Burke a written question, asking if they could agree on only part of the charges.

The chiefs mentioned on which there would be agreement are those concerning the alleged sexual assault on former production assistant Mimi Haleyi and the rape said to have suffered the aspiring actress Jessica Mann.

The two remaining counts each constitute an aggravating circumstance of “predatory” behavior. These are the most serious, likely to result in the conviction of Harvey Weinstein to life.

Justice Burke consulted the prosecution and the defense to find out their position. The defense of Harvey Weinstein said he was in favor of a partial verdict, but prosecutor Joan Illuzzi-Orbon replied that the prosecution was “not (ready) to accept” this decision “at this stage”.

The judge then called the jury back. “I will ask you to continue your deliberations,” he said, after having read them the official text which explains that it is normal for a jury to sometimes have the impression of finding themselves in a dead-end.

The magistrate did not answer the jury’s question directly and therefore did not tell them whether it was possible to reach a partial verdict, which is, however, a possibility. The jury’s question was raised on the fourth day of deliberations, a few minutes before the time scheduled for a suspension until Monday.

Throughout the week, the jurors asked that they are re-read several testimonies, mainly those of Mimi Haleyi and actress Annabella Sciorra, who claims to have been raped by Harvey Weinstein during the winter of 1993.

Annabella Sciorra’s testimony is crucial because the counts of “predator” include her allegations, to show that the producer had recurrent behavior.

The jurors, on the other hand, did not ask any questions or ask for anything concerning Jessica Mann, who is linked to three charges and whose testimony at the hearing was considerably weakened by the defense.

Harvey Weinstein has always denied any sexual assault, saying it was consensual. 

More

Show your support if you like our work.

Author

News Room
News Room
The Eastern Herald’s Editorial Board validates, writes, and publishes the stories under this byline. That includes editorials, news stories, letters to the editor, and multimedia features on easternherald.com.

Comments

-Advertisement-

Editor's Picks

Trending Stories

Bridging Foes, Blessing Ties: Riyadh’s role in Indo-Pak peace

Who would have thought when Pakistan first announced its...

Finland says the UN VETO shields impunity and dares the P5 to give it up

New York — Finland has thrown its diplomatic weight...

NYT Spelling Bee answers Today: All words, pangrams, points (Sep 13, 2025)

Updated: September 14, 2025, 04:30 IST • Today’s live...

NYT Spelling Bee answers today, September 24, 2025

NYT Spelling Bee answers for today — Wednesday, September...

Trump draws red line, blocks Israeli annexation bid in West Bank

Washington — President Donald Trump drew an unusually firm...

Discover more from The Eastern Herald

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading