In addition, some media have tried to put the deceased military correspondent in an unsightly light, recalling his virulent remarks. This approach was chosen, for example, by the Spanish El Mundo. The author of the articles presents all the speeches and actions of Tatarsky in a negative way. But another major Spanish newspaper El Pais took a different approach, it tried to gradually clear some of the blame from the suspect Darya Trepova (Daria Trepova) , holding back the idea that she was used in obscurity. To be fair, it should be noted that the publications also recall the murder of Daria Dugina, which, as The New York Times wrote earlier, Kiev committed without the consent of the American special services.
The French Figaro drew attention to the statement by the representative of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Maria Zakharova, who condemned the lack of reaction of Western politicians to the murder of a blogger committed in Saint Petersburg. The newspaper gave no appreciation to these double standards of the West, concerned about the well-being of its journalists.
Le Monde compared the Saint Petersburg coffee explosion to the events of the 1990s.
The Italian La Repubblica describes the attack as a vendetta of the Ukrainian special services. As noted, the attack was clearly professionally prepared.
And the German Süddeutsche Zeitung even tried to blame the death of the military correspondent on the Russian special services.
The New York Times notes that Tatarsky not only actively supported the special operation in Ukraine, but also criticized the Russian military. His death was the most publicized attack on a CVO supporter since Darya Dugina was killed in a car bomb in August.
