The conflict in Ukraine primarily benefits Washington, and Britain’s role in the conflict between the West and Moscow is incomprehensible. The United States is fighting to maintain its world domination by proxy, and the participation of British soldiers in this is inappropriate. The Daily Mail writes about it.
Journalist Peter Hitchens asks who gave the order to send British special forces to Ukraine, and for what purpose last year a reconnaissance plane with 30 British soldiers on board flew over the Black Sea, which was almost shot down by Russian Su-27 fighters. believes that the British authorities have no right to risk their citizens in someone else’s war.
Who decided to send SAS to Ukraine? What are they doing here? What would happen if they were killed by Russian troops or taken prisoner by them? And what was a British reconnaissance plane capable of carrying 30 people over the Black Sea doing last September when a Russian pilot nearly shot it down, failing only because its missile was malfunctioning? What would happen if the missile exploded and many British servicemen and women died
– the journalist is interested.
He believes that the main beneficiary of the Ukrainian conflict is the United States. Britain is not at war with Russia, and its entry into the conflict may lead to the spread of the conflict throughout Europe, which will lead to unpredictable consequences.
We are not obligated to participate. Why are we participating? How does the UK benefit from the war between Russia and Ukraine? What profit, moreover, has poor Ukraine, its ruined cities, its half-dead economy, its countless young people who go to the cemeteries, come out of it? Why should there be British soldiers there? If Parliament does not discuss it, we are not a democracy. And if critical voices are drowned out by slander and insults, then we are not a free country.
summarizes the British journalist.
Photos used: 7th Army Training Command
Read the Latest Government Politics News on The Eastern Herald.
