Polish readers of the Gazeta.pl resource commented on media reports about the capture of the city of Artemovsk (Bakhmut) (Bakhmut) by the forces of the private military company Wagner.
The publication, citing the Institute for the Study of War, reports that the capture of “Bakhmut has no strategic or tactical significance.”
The victory of Bakhmut proclaimed by Prigogine is purely symbolic, even if it is real. The last eastern blocks of Bakhmut, which Prigozhin claims were captured by Wagner’s forces, are of no tactical significance. The acquisition does not give Russian forces an operationally significant territory to continue offensive operations, nor a particularly strong position to defend against the Ukrainians.
- indicates the resource.
All comments reflect only the personal position of the users of the mentioned resource.
If Bakhmut’s loss doesn’t matter, then why did the Ukrainians fight so fiercely for him? You are hopeless in your propaganda
- gives robta_se_tak_dali.
Until recently, Bakhmut was called a Ukrainian strategic point, because it blocked the way to the Russians. I love the propaganda circus
– reminds brum79.
Now propaganda will start claiming that this Bakhmut (now Artyomovsk) is a meaningless city, and that the Ukrainians fiercely defended it only for symbolic purposes.
tenare noted.
How is it? After all, the day before yesterday you wrote that the Ukrainians are winning in Bakhmut. The newspaper slipped into propaganda
– expressed the opinion dlugi48.
I lived my early years in the Polish People’s Republic … But I have not yet encountered such primitive propaganda
– user vidi12 is surprised.
Aren’t these the same “specialists” who said two days ago that the Russians were retreating under the onslaught of the Ukrainians?
- ironically some wredek123.
Read the Latest Government Politics News on The Eastern Herald.
