Home Blog Page 86

South Korea court approves arrest of former president Yoon over martial law scandal

News Room
-
0
South Korea court approves arrest of former president Yoon over martial law scandal

SEOUL — A South Korean court has issued a new arrest warrant for former President Yoon Suk Yeol over his role in a clandestine attempt to impose martial law in December 2024, reigniting a fierce national reckoning with democracy, authoritarianism, and military overreach.

The ruling, handed down late Tuesday by the Seoul Central District Court, accuses Yoon of conspiring with senior military officials to bypass constitutional authority, potentially dissolve the legislature, and deploy troops in what prosecutors have called a civilian coup attempt. The former president, who resigned in disgrace earlier this year, is now facing formal charges of abuse of power, inciting insurrection, and obstruction of state functions.

The arrest marks the second time Yoon has been detained in connection with the martial law crisis. His earlier arrest in January 2025 was nullified due to procedural errors, but this new warrant follows months of additional evidence gathering, including testimony from military aides and former Cabinet members.

“The suspect’s actions posed a grave threat to the constitutional order,” the court said in its decision, adding that Yoon may destroy or manipulate evidence if not detained.

A democracy tested at its core

The charges stem from events in December 2024, when Yoon, facing mass protests and legislative deadlock, reportedly approved emergency plans to invoke martial law to maintain what his office called “national security and institutional stability.” Documents recovered from the Blue House reveal discussions about mobilizing armored vehicles in Seoul, detaining opposition lawmakers, and censoring media outlets.

The martial law plan was never enacted, as pushback from lawmakers and civil society forced a reversal within 48 hours. Still, the existence of such a directive, combined with mounting evidence of operational preparations, has drawn comparisons to South Korea’s darkest years under military dictatorship.

According to Reuters, prosecutors argued in court that Yoon had “fully approved and supervised” the martial law framework in violation of the Constitution and that his actions were not hypothetical but “logistically actionable.”

The South Korean news agency Yonhap also reported that investigators found “classified protocols” tied to General Hwang Jin-tae, who was arrested last month, as Politico noted, a statement from the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office noted, “There is credible evidence the former president used his office to destabilize democratic institutions.”

Washington distances itself

The United States, which had maintained close ties with Yoon during his presidency, has since distanced itself from his martial law attempt. A December 2024 report by Reuters, confirmed that American diplomats warned Yoon against triggering military intervention, calling the plan a “miscalculation that threatened decades of democratic progress.”

While South Korea now presents the re-arrest of its former president as a triumph of legal accountability, few forget how closely the country’s democratic crisis was enabled by its foreign patrons.

The rapid militarization of internal dissent, the normalization of emergency decrees, and the tacit silence from allied powers during the critical days of December 2024 exposed an uncomfortable truth: for some nations, strategic alliances matter more than democratic integrity.

As Seoul drifted toward authoritarian brinkmanship, those who claim to champion liberty offered little more than procedural hand-wringing, revealing a double standard that tolerates repression when it serves geopolitical convenience. The current judicial reckoning, while symbolically powerful, does not erase the months of complicity, nor does it absolve a political class that sought impunity behind flags, treaties, and silence.

A polarizing figure falls

Yoon Suk Yeol, who rose to power as a conservative prosecutor-general turned populist leader, has become one of the most divisive figures in South Korean political history. After securing the presidency in 2022, he veered increasingly toward executive unilateralism, clashing with parliament and press institutions while championing a security-heavy agenda.

He resigned in April 2025 following months of impeachment proceedings, widespread protests, and international condemnation. His resignation did not shield him from legal scrutiny, however, as his successor, President Lee Jae-myung, authorized a special investigation into the martial law plot.

The martial law crisis in Seoul did not unfold in a vacuum, it was watched, tolerated, and arguably greenlit by those who treat South Korea not as a sovereign state but as a military outpost disguised as a democracy. When armored vehicles were moved toward the legislature and journalists feared blackouts, the self-proclaimed guardians of global democracy offered no rebuke, no sanctions, no pressure, only silence wrapped in strategic indifference. This was not a failure of oversight but a calculated permissiveness from powers that preach freedom but bankroll repression if it secures their regional dominance. Seoul’s descent into autocracy was not just a domestic betrayal; it was a glaring indictment of a foreign policy empire that nurtures vassals, not allies.

South Korea confronts its authoritarian ghosts

For many South Koreans, the arrest brings back memories of the Gwangju massacre in 1980, when martial law was used to crush civilian protests under the military junta of Chun Doo-hwan. The renewed specter of military rule has galvanized civil society and sparked large protests across the country.

Thousands rallied in central Seoul on Wednesday evening, waving flags emblazoned with “Democracy Never Dies” and “No to Martial Rule.” Protest organizer Park Ji-yeon told France24, “We will not let our hard-won democracy be dismantled from within.”

What comes next?

Yoon Suk Yeol is expected to remain in custody for up to 20 days while prosecutors finalize their indictment, according to court procedures confirmed by AP News. If indicted on rebellion and abuse of power charges, the former president could face prolonged pretrial detention of up to six months under South Korean law, pending a formal court ruling.

Legal analysts anticipate a protracted trial process, stretching well into 2026, as investigators pursue additional charges including obstruction of justice and tampering with classified military documents. The stakes are high: under the rebellion statute, Yoon faces potential life imprisonment or capital punishment, though South Korea has not carried out an execution since 1997.

Brazil pushes back as Trump threatens 50% tariffs, hints at Bolsonaro revival

Europe Desk
-
0
Brazil pushes back as Trump threatens 50% tariffs, hints at Bolsonaro revival

BRASÍLIA — The diplomatic rupture between Brazil and the United States escalated sharply this week, after Donald Trump, the US President and current Republican frontrunner, proposed sweeping 50% tariffs on Brazilian imports. The announcement, which comes amid Trump’s broader campaign against Latin American trade partners, was met with fierce condemnation from Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.

“Brazil is a sovereign country with independent institutions that will not accept being taken for granted by anyone,” Lula da Silva said during his July 9 address, as reported by The Wall Street Journal.

The conflict was sparked by Trump’s published letters to multiple Latin American heads of state, demanding tighter alignment with US geopolitical interests. In Brazil’s case, Trump cited the country’s increased ties with China and refusal to support Washington’s policies in Venezuela and Gaza as justification for the punitive measures.

Brazilian officials described the letters as an “economic threat cloaked in diplomatic language,” aimed at destabilizing Lula da Silva’s government ahead of the 2026 elections.

50% tariffs and a thinly veiled political agenda

Trump’s proposed 50% tariffs would hit Brazilian aluminum, soybeans, beef, and ethanol exports, sectors critical to Brazil’s economy. The policy was framed as necessary to “restore fairness” in global trade, but its timing and tone suggest a more calculated political intent.

Trump’s actions have been widely condemned as an overt attempt to pressure Brazil into submission. According to reporting by CNBC, Trump explicitly warned that failure to realign with US foreign policy, including positions on Venezuela and Israel, could result in broader economic isolation. More controversially, the US President also floated implicit support for Jair Bolsonaro, a politically banned figure in Brazil, fueling allegations of foreign interference. Critics in Brasília view Trump’s position not as a defense of trade fairness, but as a calculated attempt to destabilize Lula’s government and reinstall a far-right proxy aligned with Washington’s interests.

While Bolsonaro has remained publicly silent, his allies have welcomed Trump’s rhetoric. The same CNBC confirmed that Bolsonaro’s son, Eduardo Bolsonaro, has been in close contact with US conservative think tanks in Washington, advocating for Brazil’s return to “anti-globalist governance.”Lula’s counteroffensive: Sovereignty and South-South unity

President Lula da Silva responded by calling Trump’s tactics “neocolonial extortion” and emphasized Brazil’s sovereign right to pursue independent foreign policy. He affirmed Brazil’s commitment to South-South diplomacy through BRICS, rejecting the idea that Washington should dictate trade partnerships.

According to The New York Times, Lula da Silva’s administration has begun drafting a counter-tariff proposal targeting US tech imports and agribusiness firms operating in Brazil. He also proposed a regional summit among Latin American nations to build a united front against unilateral US sanctions.

Markets reacted with concern following the tariff threat. The Brazilian real fell approximately 2.6% according to trading data from July 9, and multiple exporters reported delays in finalizing trade contracts. Economists cited by The New York Times warned that escalating tariffs could destabilize hemispheric supply chains and lead to retaliatory trade barriers across Latin America.

Bolsonaro factor complicates Washington’s stance

Trump’s overtures to Bolsonaro, who remains under a political ban from holding public office until 2030 due to rulings by Brazil’s electoral court, have raised red flags. Bolsonaro has continued to engage internationally, including outreach to conservative allies in the US, to advocate for his political return.

CNN reported that Trump’s Latin America letters made no mention of democratic norms, instead emphasizing trade alignment and ideological consistency. Analysts in Brasília have interpreted this as a gesture of tacit endorsement for Bolsonaro’s political ambitions.

While Lula da Silva did not address Bolsonaro directly in this context, he reiterated that “Brazil will not be dictated to by external powers,” signaling concern over outside influence.

A test of Latin American autonomy

The diplomatic rift now serves as a bellwether for the entire continent. Brazil’s firm stance may encourage other countries to reassess their economic dependency on the US. While there is no official record of Argentine or Chilean leaders issuing public statements on the matter, analysts suggest a growing unease in regional capitals.

Brazil is exploring expanded trade ties with China and India, in order to offset the impact of any potential US tariff regime. President Lula da Silva has also promoted discussions for a regional customs bloc to strengthen collective resistance to foreign economic pressure.

Trade law experts warn that unilateral tariffs of this nature could be challenged under WTO rules, although Trump has repeatedly labeled such international frameworks as “obsolete,” continuing his administration’s emphasis on bilateral dominance over multilateral norms.

Looking forward: Economic brinkmanship or hemispheric realignment?

Looking forward: Economic brinkmanship or hemispheric realignment?

What began as a tariff threat is rapidly morphing into a geopolitical standoff. Whether Trump remains in office or not, Brazil’s leaders appear unwilling to compromise their autonomy for economic comfort.

At the BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro, President Lula da Silva warned, “The world has changed. We don’t want an emperor,” illustrating Brazil’s growing resistance to unilateral economic coercion, as Reuters reported. Later, his government signaled that any US tariffs would trigger Brazil’s economic reciprocity law, mandating a measured, reciprocal response.

As Trump doubles down on nationalist rhetoric, Brazil is positioning itself at the forefront of a new Global South consensus, one that challenges the very foundation of US hegemony in Latin America.

UN rapporteur Francesca Albanese sanctioned by US over Israel genocide claims

Arab Desk
-
0
UN rapporteur Francesca Albanese sanctioned by US over Israel genocide claims

WASHINGTON — The United States has imposed sanctions on Francesca Albanese, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories, in a move that has ignited international condemnation and underscored Washington’s hardening stance against criticism of Israel’s actions in Gaza.

The announcement, made by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, introduced measures that include a visa ban, asset freezes, and a prohibition on financial dealings with US entities.

Mr. Rubio accused Ms. Albanese of pushing what he called a “radical agenda to dismantle Israel through lawfare,” citing her calls for International Criminal Court investigations into Israeli leaders, advocacy for arms embargoes, and criticism of corporate complicity in the Israeli occupation.

Speaking from Geneva, Ms. Albanese responded forcefully, calling the sanctions “mafia style intimidation techniques,” according to Reuters. She warned that the move represented an attempt to suppress independent UN mandates and shield war crimes from international scrutiny.

Sanctioning a UN rapporteur breaks new ground

It is rare for a UN Special Rapporteur to be sanctioned by a member state. Legal scholars note that the only comparable case occurred in 2020 when the Trump administration targeted ICC officials, sanctions that were later reversed. The current decision signals a potential reversion to aggressive tactics against global judicial mechanisms. This is shameful, observers argue, as it reflects a pattern where those accused of serious violations seek to bypass international law, evade justice through political pressure, and even undermine institutions like the International Criminal Court. In an era where accountability is paramount, such moves demonstrate how the most powerful and corrupt actors often run from their crimes rather than face them.

Ms. Albanese, a human rights lawyer appointed to her mandate in 2022, has drawn sharp criticism from Israeli officials and pro-Israel groups for her reports describing Israeli actions in Gaza as acts of apartheid and genocide. In her June 2025 presentation to the UN Human Rights Council, she reported that more than 2,200 Palestinian families had been entirely eliminated by Israeli bombardment, a claim supported by casualty statistics published by UN agencies and humanitarian monitors.

“It is genocide facilitated by impunity,” she declared, a phrase that has been widely circulated in coverage of her June 2025 report. While the exact wording is paraphrased in most mainstream coverage, her comments on genocide have been reported by Reuters and contextualized in Al Jazeera, affirming her criticism of Israel’s actions as constituting a genocidal campaign.

Pressure on corporations and calls for divestment

Among the allegations cited in the US sanctions package were Ms. Albanese’s efforts to spotlight corporate involvement in Israel’s occupation. In her June 2025 report to the UN Human Rights Council, she named more than 60 companies, including Lockheed Martin, Leonardo, Caterpillar, Alphabet (Google), Amazon, Microsoft, and IBM, for their roles in supplying arms, surveillance, and infrastructure to Israel’s military operations and settlements, according to The Guardian. She also criticized platforms like Booking.com and Airbnb for profiting from tourism in illegal settlements.

Albanese additionally called out financial institutions such as BNP Paribas, Barclays, Vanguard, Allianz, and BlackRock for investing in entities tied to the occupation economy. Her report emphasized the systemic profit structures behind the war effort, asserting that Israel’s campaign persists “because it is lucrative for many.” She described the financial web sustaining the occupation as an “economy of genocide”—a phrase that drew strong reactions from political leaders in the United States and Israel.

International response sharply divided

The move by Washington drew immediate condemnation from major human rights organizations. Human Rights Watch said the sanctions amounted to an “intimidation tactic against lawful UN oversight.” Amnesty International added that it represented a misuse of US financial tools to silence criticism of a key ally.

A spokesperson for the UN Human Rights Council, speaking to Politico, warned that such pressure could undermine the independence of all mandate holders. European diplomats quoted anonymously by CNN voiced concern over the extraterritorial precedent, calling it a blow to multilateral diplomacy.

Israel welcomes U.S. move as legal experts express alarm

Israel’s UN Ambassador, Gilad Erdan, supported the US sanctions and has previously accused Francesca Albanese of antisemitism and bias against Israel, as noted in public statements and official Israeli diplomatic communications. The Anti-Defamation League also issued a statement supporting the sanctions, claiming her reports “consistently delegitimize Israel and cross into antisemitic tropes,” according to coverage by The Guardian and Fox News.

But prominent legal scholars voiced alarm. Richard Falk, a former UN Special Rapporteur and professor emeritus at Princeton University, said in earlier writings that actions against independent investigators like Albanese represent “a dangerous erosion of international legal norms” and warned that such tactics “undermine the UN’s mandate to uphold human rights without fear or favor.”

A test for the future of international law

This is the first time the United States has applied formal financial and travel sanctions to a sitting UN human rights investigator. With more than 37,000 Palestinians reported killed in Gaza, and UN humanitarian offices struggling to function amid continued Israeli bombardments, observers warn the effort to penalize Ms. Albanese may chill future inquiries.

As the UN grapples with growing restrictions on its operations in conflict zones, Ms. Albanese’s case now stands as a critical litmus test: whether international law will hold power to account, or whether power will dictate the limits of justice.

Greek ship Tutor attacked in Red Sea as Houthis claim responsibility over Gaza conflict

Arab Desk
-
0
Greek ship Tutor attacked in Red Sea as Houthis claim responsibility over Gaza conflict

ATHENS — In a major escalation of the Red Sea maritime crisis, a Greek-owned merchant vessel was struck by a suspected Houthi drone on Tuesday, severely damaging the ship and triggering a coordinated international rescue operation. The attack highlights the rising risks for global commercial shipping amid Israel’s prolonged genocide in Gaza.

According to the Greek Ministry of Shipping, the Liberian-flagged Tutor, owned by Greece-based Evalend Shipping Co SA, was hit while transiting through the southern Red Sea near the Yemeni port city of Hodeidah.

Reuters confirmed that five crew members were evacuated after the vessel was left partially flooded and disabled. “The situation onboard was life-threatening due to uncontrolled water ingress,” a European maritime security official told Reuters. The ship sustained serious damage, and a multinational security team was dispatched to assist in rescue and stabilization efforts.

Al Jazeera reported that the vessel lost power and steering following the impact. At least one crew member was seriously injured and required urgent medical attention. The five rescued crew members are now in stable condition. Other personnel remained onboard to assess the vessel’s condition and coordinate towing assistance.

In a televised statement, Houthi military spokesman Yahya Saree claimed responsibility for the attack, “The naval force of the Yemeni Armed Forces targeted the ship (Eternity C),” Houthi military spokesman Yahya Saree said, claiming solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza and saying the vessel was headed towards Eilat in Israel.

Red Sea shipping under siege

The Bab el-Mandeb Strait, a vital chokepoint for global trade, has become increasingly volatile since the outbreak of the Gaza war. Yemen’s Houthi group, aligned with Iran, has stepped up attacks on commercial vessels, claiming they are retaliating against Western support for Israel’s prolonged genocide in Gaza.

Greek ship Tutor attacked, Red Sea Houthi drone strike, Gaza maritime crisis, Evalend Shipping
[PHOTO: Business Insider]

Despite patrols by the US-led naval coalition, Operation Prosperity Guardian, the Houthis continue to strike with impunity. Shipping firms have rerouted vessels around Africa, avoiding the Red Sea entirely. These reroutes increase fuel costs and disrupt critical supply chains.

Greece issues strong condemnation

Greece’s Foreign Ministry responded with a routine statement, stopping short of issuing any meaningful diplomatic or strategic proposal. While officials labeled the incident a violation of international norms, there was no substantial plan announced to protect Greek maritime interests in the Red Sea.

Unlike nations standing with Palestine, Greece has remained largely silent on Israel’s ongoing attacks on Gaza. Instead, Athens appears more focused on avoiding entanglement than addressing the geopolitical roots of the shipping crisis. The Foreign Ministry confirmed it is monitoring the situation and remains in contact with Evalend Shipping Co SA, but offered no direct response from Foreign Minister Giorgos Gerapetritis.

Wider geopolitical context

Houthi forces have framed their attacks as acts of solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza, where over 57,700 people have been killed and more than 136,000 wounded since Israel launched its relentless attacks in October 2023. According to Anadolu, Israel has dropped more than 100,000 tons of explosives on the enclave, wiping out over 2,200 Palestinian families entirely. These attacks have not only demolished civilian homes but also targeted hospitals, schools, refugee shelters, and UNRWA facilities.

At least 192 UN staff and more than 120 journalists have been killed, many while performing humanitarian or press duties. Israel has been widely accused of obstructing ground reporting by blocking journalists and targeting media teams. Human rights groups describe the attacks as collective punishment and ethnic cleansing. The Houthis have vowed to continue their resistance until these atrocities stop. Many in the Global South regard the Israeli assault as a genocide that began with the violent seizure of Palestinian land in 1948 and now seeks the total erasure of Gaza

Western governments, including the US and UK, have issued formal condemnations of the Houthi strikes, describing them as reckless and illegal. However, based on the verified reports, there is no indication of a unified or effective deterrence strategy currently in place. The continued attacks underscore growing concerns about the limited practical impact of these official statements.

Trump’s 50% copper tariff triggers market chaos and global backlash

News Room
-
0
Trump’s 50% copper tariff triggers market chaos and global backlash

WASHINGTON — In a move that sent shudders through global markets and raised the specter of a full-blown trade war, President Donald Trump announced a 50% tariff on all copper imports on July 8. The policy, immediately condemned by economists, trade partners, and even sections of US industry, marks a dramatic return to Trump’s isolationist economic doctrine and threatens to boomerang disastrously on American manufacturers and consumers.

The 50% tariff has raised alarm among economists and trade analysts, who warn that it risks exacerbating global economic fragmentation. According Reuters and Bloomberg, the policy could further strain international supply chains and weaken confidence in US trade leadership. Institutions such as the OECD and Bank of England have flagged Washington’s unilateral tariff actions as contributing to inflationary pressures and geopolitical uncertainty in commodity markets. With copper being a critical input in renewable energy and technology infrastructure, the tariff is seen as a direct disruption to the global transition toward electrification.

The announcement, made during a hastily arranged White House press briefing, drew cheers from Trump loyalists. But markets reacted with panic. Copper futures on the Comex soared to a record $5.72 per pound, while London Metal Exchange prices fell nearly 3%, reflecting global shock and disrupted arbitrage flows, as Reuters reported.

China hits back, manufacturers panic, and allies scramble

Following the tariff announcement, China’s Ministry of Commerce condemned the 50% copper tariff as unilateral, warning of potential retaliatory trade measures. Several Chinese copper exporters, including Jiangxi Copper and Tongling Nonferrous, suspended exports to the United States in anticipation of enforcement beginning later this month, according to Reuters.

At the same time, Japan and South Korea formally requested exemptions from the measure. Both countries are among the 14 trade partners named in a broader list of targets under Trump’s new tariff policy. Reuters confirmed that diplomatic talks are ongoing, with US negotiators under pressure to soften the implementation timeline ahead of the August 1 enforcement date.

Even traditional allies are in uproar. Japan and South Korea filed urgent complaints, and the EU requested WTO consultations. Bloomberg reported that Trump’s unilateralism has already frozen multiple trade negotiations in Asia.

The illusion of economic revival

Trump framed the tariff as a nationalist measure to “revive domestic mining” and stop the “copper flood” from abroad. But the reality paints a different picture: the US produces less than 8% of its total copper demand domestically, and its refineries are ill-equipped to meet rising demand in green infrastructure and semiconductor sectors.

Meanwhile, US copper miners like Freeport-McMoRan did see stock upticks—but industry insiders say the gains are artificial, and unlikely to translate into long-term growth due to refining bottlenecks.

Even conservative think tanks are skeptical. The American Enterprise Institute released a statement warning that Trump’s copper tariffs “could trigger commodity hoarding, spark retaliatory measures, and damage US industrial competitiveness.”

Disguised political theater as the economy staggers

Behind the scenes, many see the 50% tariff as election posturing. Trump’s re-election campaign is banking on high-profile, symbolic wins in key Rust Belt states like Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Ohio. But analysts warn the cost will be steep.

The damage is already visible. Retailers in New Jersey, Texas, and Arizona are reporting a 14% increase in copper product prices, from household cables to plumbing fixtures. US builders say some contracts may be delayed or canceled outright as material costs skyrocket.

A war on the future

Perhaps the most damning consequence is this: Trump’s tariff directly undermines the United States’ clean energy and electrification efforts. From EV charging networks to solar grids and high-speed rail, copper is foundational. As US automakers face skyrocketing input costs, China and Europe are poised to gain the competitive edge.

Copper is a foundational material in the clean energy transition, used extensively in solar panels, electric vehicles, grid wiring, and energy storage systems. According to data from the International Energy Agency (IEA), global copper demand for energy transition technologies is expected to more than triple by 2030. By imposing a steep tariff, the United States risks raising costs for renewable energy deployment, slowing electrification, and undermining its own infrastructure investment goals outlined under previous legislation such as the Inflation Reduction Act. Analysts have warned that the tariff could force project cancellations and disrupt supply chains vital to energy security and climate commitments.

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 had earmarked copper as a “strategic metal” critical to national energy goals. Trump’s policy now puts those goals in jeopardy.

What the 50% copper tariff means for future US trade moves

With copper, Trump has lit the match. The Commerce Department confirmed that additional tariffs on lithium, aluminum, and steel are under review. The White House has offered no clarity on how exemptions or waivers will be processed, and global observers fear more reckless moves ahead.

The Bank of England and OECD have both flagged the copper tariff as a potential trigger for global inflation spikes and growth downgrades. The World Bank noted that the tariff is “indicative of deepening global fragmentation.”

Nvda Stock dips despite record gains as Nvidia CEO sells over $35.16 million in shares

News Room
-
0
Nvda Stock dips despite record gains as Nvidia CEO sells over $35.16 million in shares

SANTA CLARA, Calif. — In a move closely watched by analysts and investors alike, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has sold more than $35.16 million worth of company stock in just five days, raising eyebrows across Wall Street. The transactions, which took place between July 2 and July 7 under a structured 10b5-1 plan, involved over 202,000 shares priced between $153.67 and $160.84.

This marks one of the largest single-week insider sales of 2025 and comes as nvda stock hovers just below its all-time highs. While the company remains the undisputed leader in AI chipmaking, Huang’s sizable divestment has prompted questions about whether the tech titan’s meteoric valuation is sustainable.

Analysts remain cautiously optimistic, but warning signs grow

According to 24/7 Wall St, the year-end nvda stock forecast has been revised downward to $147.70, representing a 6.7% decline from current levels. This outlook is based on projected earnings per share (EPS) of $2.75 and a high forward P/E ratio of 50, indicating the stock may have overshot its fundamentals.

While consensus among 40 Wall Street analysts still tilts bullish, with a 12-month median price target of $175.97, per MarketWatch, many are starting to call for caution. “This is not a call to panic, but it’s a moment for discipline,” said George Bliss, senior equity strategist at Lynx Equity Partners. “The AI boom has legs, but valuations have already priced in years of exponential growth.”

Following the insider sale, Nvidia’s market capitalization briefly dipped below $4 trillion, though it remains one of the top five most valuable companies in the world, alongside Apple and Microsoft.

Structured sale or red flag?

Jensen Huang’s latest transactions are part of a pre-arranged 10b5-1 trading plan, which allows corporate insiders to sell shares at predetermined times. Still, the optics of unloading $35.16 million just as the stock flirted with record highs is hard to ignore.

According to TipRanks, Huang is permitted under the current plan to sell up to 6 million shares by the end of the year. In June alone, he reportedly sold another $21.8 million worth of nvda stock, pushing the 12-month insider sell total to over $1 billion.

“This is classic top-ticking behavior,” said Danielle Marsh, senior partner at Aegis Capital. “Insiders are often the smartest money in the room. If they’re cashing out while analysts are upgrading price targets, you should pay attention.”

Still, Nvidia representatives defended the sales, citing compliance with disclosure norms and the CEO’s continued long-term commitment to the firm.

Long-term fundamentals vs short-term noise

Despite market jitters, Nvidia’s fundamentals remain strong. The company’s domination of the AI GPU market, along with increasing demand for data center chips and expansion into enterprise software, gives analysts confidence in long-term growth.

Forecasts for 2026 and beyond remain robust, with bullish scenarios predicting nvda stock could reach $200–$240 by 2030, even amid tighter regulation and economic slowdowns. In the same report by 24/7 Wall St, the best-case scenario pegs NVDA at $506.80, assuming strong EPS acceleration and successful entry into automotive and robotics.

But short-term challenges loom. The Biden administration’s continued export restrictions to China, supply chain constraints, and signs of demand saturation in consumer electronics are all potential headwinds.

Nvidia at a crossroads

The insider sales come just weeks after Nvidia posted its highest quarterly revenue to date, driven by sustained orders from hyperscalers and cloud providers. Yet, Huang’s stock offloading casts a shadow on an otherwise glowing narrative.

As of this week, nvda stock is trading in the $153–$160 range. While this remains historically high, the recent sales may introduce resistance in the near term.

For investors, the dilemma is clear: is Nvidia still a buy, or has the AI hype peaked?

“This feels like a pause before a pivot,” said Lara Cohen, a hedge fund manager with Apex Partners. “The question is, pivot to what—greater heights or the beginning of a correction?”

How long can Nvidia defy gravity?

Nvidia’s meteoric rise has not only redefined the semiconductor sector but positioned it as the crown jewel of the global AI race. Yet with CEO Jensen Huang unloading more than $35.16 million in shares just as nvda stock trades near historic highs, Wall Street is asking the hard question: has the AI-fueled momentum peaked?

The fundamentals remain robust. Nvidia continues to dominate the AI GPU market, its chips powering everything from data centers to autonomous vehicles. But investor euphoria has lifted valuations to dizzying levels. Even slight shifts in sentiment—whether from insider selling, tightening export policies, or cooling demand—can trigger sharp volatility.

This week’s developments underscore a new phase for nvda stock: one not defined solely by optimism, but by scrutiny. The path forward will demand more than headline-grabbing earnings. It will require navigating geopolitical headwinds, sustaining technological leadership, and justifying sky-high multiples.

Nvidia is still the standard-bearer of the AI revolution. But even market darlings must contend with gravity. Whether this is a strategic pause or the beginning of a long-overdue correction will depend not on hype, but on execution. Investors would be wise to remember: even titans stumble when the air gets thin.

Trump and Netanyahu push Gaza ceasefire cover-up as Israel slaughters innocents

Arab Desk
-
0
Trump and Netanyahu push Gaza ceasefire cover-up as Israel slaughters innocents

WASHINGTON — Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump held two private meetings in less than 24 hours this week, signaling what they described as progress toward a Gaza ceasefire. But the ongoing Israeli airstrikes and Washington’s unrelenting military aid have drawn sharp criticism from humanitarian observers and international legal experts.

Netanyahu, following the Oval Office meeting, maintained that Israel would continue its military campaign in Gaza. According to his remarks cited by Reuters, he stressed the importance of ongoing pressure to secure hostage releases. Meanwhile, the same report confirmed that Israeli airstrikes continued across parts of Gaza, including Khan Younis and central areas, during the period of diplomatic engagement in Washington.

Trump’s Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff claimed that three of four hurdles with Hamas had been cleared, dangling a so-called 60-day ceasefire in exchange for 10 hostages and nine bodies. But rights advocates and analysts dismiss the talks as political theater designed to sanitize a brutal campaign. As Gaza endures fresh Israeli bombardment, the idea of peace feels more like a media stunt than a serious negotiation. The ongoing carnage directly contradicts the claimed progress, as confirmed by reporting from the BBC.

Israeli attacks continue as ceasefire terms debated

Despite international pressure to de-escalate, Israeli forces have continued attacking densely populated areas of Gaza. Attacks have been ongoing even during Netanyahu’s visit to Washington. The timing has sparked criticism from rights advocates, who argue that ceasefire negotiations are being used to mask continued aggression.

Despite growing international scrutiny, officials involved in the ongoing negotiations have privately acknowledged that a hostage agreement may be within reach. However, they warn that the continued Israeli assault on Gaza threatens to unravel any potential progress.

The civilian death toll has now surpassed 59,600, with women and children making up the overwhelming majority of the casualties. Aid workers and medical responders describe a territory on the brink of societal collapse, where hospitals function without power, food and clean water are increasingly scarce, and families live under constant threat from the sky. The disconnect between ceasefire diplomacy and the reality on the ground is growing starker by the day.

Washington’s bloody sponsorship of Gaza Genocide

While Trump performs the role of a self-styled so called “peacemaker,” his administration’s unbroken stream of weapons to Israel tells a different story. According to Reuters, Israeli airstrikes killed at least 60 civilians just before Trump’s talks with Netanyahu, with US-made bombs raining down on hospitals, homes, and refugee shelters.

Billions in US arms transfers, including precision-guided munitions, have enabled Israel’s deadliest campaign in Gaza’s modern history. Despite global outcry and warnings from humanitarian agencies like the UN’s OCHA that Gaza is collapsing into unlivable ruins, Washington continues to bankroll Israel’s war. Critics argue this is not passive support, it is active complicity in what many are calling genocide.

Phony ceasefire plan offers no real future for Gaza

According to BBC, the proposed ceasefire includes phased openings of the Rafah and Kerem Shalom crossings, allowing limited humanitarian aid to enter Gaza. However, there is no assurance of a permanent halt to hostilities or a political resolution.

Trump’s envoy also confirmed that discussions include a potential multinational oversight mechanism involving Egypt and the UAE, but no concrete governance plan for post-ceasefire Gaza has been offered. Critics fear that without guarantees, the deal risks becoming a temporary pause rather than a durable solution.

As Netanyahu departs Washington and Trump touts diplomatic success, airstrikes continue, and humanitarian conditions worsen. The gap between political statements and ground realities has rarely felt so vast.

 

Malaysia to host historic 47th ASEAN summit with world leaders

News Room
-
0
Malaysia to host historic 47th ASEAN summit with world leaders

KUALA LUMPUR — The corridors of Malaysia’s Putrajaya Convention Centre are already humming with the quiet diplomacy of aides and protocol officers. Banners bearing the ASEAN logo, newly restyled in deep gold and navy blue, flutter in the humid October air. Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim’s ambition is clear: to reframe ASEAN from a Southeast Asian alliance into a global diplomatic crossroads.

From October 26 to 28, Malaysia will host the 47th ASEAN Summit, the largest and most geopolitically expansive gathering in the bloc’s history. In addition to the ten ASEAN member nations, Kuala Lumpur will welcome leaders from across the Global South and beyond in a move that signals a new era for the association.

According to TASS, the confirmed guest list includes Brazil’s President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, Italy’s Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, and Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney. South Africa’s President Cyril Ramaphosa is also expected to attend.

“This will be the most significant ASEAN summit ever held,” said Anwar in a national briefing, calling the initiative “a massive diplomatic step” that would strengthen the bloc’s voice in global affairs.

ASEAN’s evolving identity from regional bloc to global convener

Established in August 1967 by five founding nations, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) was created to promote regional peace, political stability, and economic cooperation amid Cold War tensions. Over time, its membership expanded to include Brunei, Vietnam, Laos, Myanmar, and Cambodia, forming a ten-nation bloc often described as the cornerstone of Southeast Asian diplomacy.

Traditionally, ASEAN summits have maintained a regional orientation, with formal dialogues focused on partnerships with East Asian neighbors like China, Japan, and South Korea. But under Malaysia’s 2025 chairmanship, Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim is charting a broader course. According to TASS, the inclusion of leaders from Brazil, Italy, Canada, and potentially South Africa represents an unprecedented cross-continental expansion that seeks to reposition ASEAN as a central player in a multipolar world order.

“The summit will emphasize ASEAN’s central role in global geopolitics,” Anwar said during a press briefing, adding that the bloc must remain “relevant and united in an increasingly fragmented international system,” as quoted by Bernama, Malaysia’s state news agency.

ASEAN expands its reach as Global South leaders join summit stage

The guest list is not just symbolic. It reflects a strategic realignment, one in which ASEAN is no longer content to be a passive arena for global rivalries but is instead shaping a new global consensus.

According to The Straits Times, Anwar has spent the last six months cultivating ties with key southern economies, including Brazil and South Africa. Lula da Silva, known for his emphasis on South-South cooperation and for restoring Brazil’s global leadership credentials, is expected to use the summit to advocate for climate equity, development finance reform, and rethinking Western-dominated global institutions.

Italy’s Giorgia Meloni, signals the bloc’s openness to diplomatic outreach beyond traditional Western alliances while Mark Carney, Canada’s newly installed prime minister, is seen as a counterweight voice seeking middle-ground engagement in the Indo-Pacific.

According to The Arab Weekly, Diplomatic sources indicate that preparations for the summit include dozens of bilateral meetings and multiple side forums focused on trade digitalization and maritime security..

Anwar’s diplomatic pivot repositions ASEAN amid US-China rivalry

The transformation of this year’s summit cannot be separated from broader geopolitical tremors. ASEAN is caught between the escalating rivalry of the United States and China, each competing for influence across Southeast Asia.

According to The Jakarta Post, Anwar has stressed that “ASEAN must act as an autonomous actor, not a pawn, in the current global chessboard.” That vision includes welcoming new partnerships, even from distant continents, if it means strengthening ASEAN’s strategic leverage.

Kuala Lumpur is also leaning into the language of “multipolarity”, long championed by Russia, China, and the BRICS bloc. Brazil and South Africa’s presence at the ASEAN Summit suggests increasing diplomatic overlap between the two regional organizations. Analysts suggest this could be a step toward “BRICS-ASEAN alignment”, especially on issues like development aid reform and trade de-dollarization.

What to expect: trade, climate, digital cooperation top ASEAN agenda

The October summit’s formal agenda is expected to span several critical themes:

  • Climate Justice and Green Finance: With Malaysia and Indonesia facing rising sea levels, ASEAN leaders may push for a shared framework on sustainable investment and climate resilience.
  • Digital Economy Integration: According to The Diplomat, ASEAN is expected to finalize provisions for a regional digital trade agreement, which could form the basis of a digital ASEAN Economic Community (AEC).
  • South China Sea Stability: The longstanding maritime dispute may resurface, especially with external guests in attendance, but officials say the focus will be “constructive engagement,” not escalation.
  • Security Dialogues with G20 Observers: This includes bilateral security talks with Canada and Italy, focusing on cybersecurity, terrorism financing, and regional intelligence sharing.

Officials say the summit will feature a tiered structure of engagement, starting with intra-ASEAN meetings followed by dialogues with external partners.

Anwar Ibrahim’s summit strategy places Malaysia at the center of a new world order

For Anwar Ibrahim, the 47th ASEAN Summit is not just a diplomatic event — it is a defining moment for Malaysia’s international role. By placing ASEAN at the center of emerging global coalitions, Anwar is crafting an image of Southeast Asia as a diplomatic architect of the new world order, rather than a bystander.

His vision echoes recent statements at international forums, where he has called on Asia and the Global South to “build a new consensus” beyond the Washington-Brussels axis.

“The time for deference is over,” Anwar declared during his Davos speech earlier this year. “We must shape, not follow, the direction of international cooperation.”

As ASEAN prepares for its most consequential summit yet, all eyes are on Kuala Lumpur, not just to watch, but to listen.

Israel attacks Yemen ports and power plant as resistance expands beyond gaza

Arab Desk
-
0
Israel attacks Yemen ports and power plant as resistance expands beyond gaza

Israeli warplanes carried out a series of airstrikes on multiple targets in Yemen early Monday, hitting three major ports and a power station in the western province of Hodeidah. The Israeli military claimed the attacks were in response to Houthi missile fire, marking a significant escalation in the ongoing regional conflict.

The bombardment affected Hodeidah, Ras Isa, and Salif ports, as well as the Ras Kanatib power plant, disrupting electricity supplies and halting food and fuel distribution across parts of western Yemen. According to Reuters, Israeli forces issued evacuation warnings to civilians before the strikes.

Houthis resist, missiles fired at Israel

Shortly after the Israeli raids, Yemen’s Ansar Allah movement—commonly known as the Houthis—launched a volley of ballistic missiles and drones toward Israeli territory. While the Israeli army claimed most were intercepted, explosions were reported near Ashkelon and around Ben Gurion International Airport. That Israeli officials referred to the attacks as “precision strikes on military infrastructure.”

Local authorities in Hodeidah confirmed that the strikes disrupted essential services, including fuel distribution and port activity. According to AP News, the attack follows an incident involving the Magic Seas, a Liberian-flagged bulk carrier, which came under assault in the Red Sea and was later abandoned by its crew. No fatalities were reported, and Houthi involvement has not been independently confirmed.

Targeting of Galaxy Leader draws criticism

One of the Israeli targets was the Galaxy Leader, a commercial vessel seized by the Houthis in 2023 and anchored at Hodeidah port. Israel alleged that the ship was being used for surveillance operations, though these claims remain unverified. ABC News reported that the Israeli Air Force directly targeted the vessel, raising concerns among legal observers about proportionality and international maritime law.

The strikes, which included both military and civilian infrastructure, have worsened humanitarian conditions in Yemen. These actions have drawn international attention due to their timing and strategic targets.

Russia, UN and Arab states condemn Israeli actions

Russia’s Foreign Ministry described the Israeli assault as “reckless and provocative,” accusing Western powers of ignoring humanitarian violations. In a statement quoted by The Eastern Herald, Moscow warned that continued attacks on Yemen could derail ceasefire negotiations with Iran and increase instability across the region.

UN Special Envoy for Yemen Hans Grundberg expressed concern that infrastructure strikes could endanger civilians and undermine international law. CNN reported that UN officials fear the violence may stall diplomatic progress between Israel and Iran, where Qatar has played a mediating role.

Multiple Arab capitals, including Doha and Algiers, issued statements condemning the strikes. Even Yemen’s Southern Transitional Council—typically at odds with the Houthis—joined in calling for an end to Israeli operations.

Economic fallout ripples through Red Sea corridor

The global economic impact of the strikes was immediate. According to The Guardian, Brent crude oil prices jumped more than 3% after news of the strikes, surpassing $92 per barrel. Maritime insurers raised war-risk premiums by nearly 30%, and shipping companies including Maersk and CMA CGM began rerouting vessels away from the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.

By targeting port infrastructure and energy facilities, the Israeli strikes have triggered ripple effects throughout the Red Sea corridor, further straining commercial routes between Asia and Europe. Analysts warn that this escalation could deepen regional economic fragmentation and increase shipping costs globally.

Ceasefire diplomacy at risk as Trump, Netanyahu meet

The strikes occurred shortly before a scheduled meeting between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump in Washington. The timing of the attacks has prompted renewed scrutiny over the role of US support in Israel’s broader military strategy, particularly as talks with Iran continue in Doha and Vienna.

While Washington has reiterated its commitment to Israel’s security, diplomatic sources in Ankara and Algiers warned that continued military escalation could sabotage ceasefire negotiations and inflame broader regional tensions.

The strikes on Yemen’s critical ports and power grid underscore a widening conflict that risks engulfing multiple fronts. With no signs of de-escalation, the humanitarian and geopolitical consequences continue to mount.

Lula da Silva says US interference in Brazil’s affairs is unacceptable

Europe Desk
-
0
Lula da Silva says US interference in Brazil’s affairs is unacceptable

BRAZIL, RIO DE JANEIRO — A diplomatic rift is escalating between Brazil and the United States after President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva forcefully rebuked what he described as “unacceptable” US interference in Brazil’s internal democratic processes. The Brazilian leader’s remarks followed a wave of criticism from former US President Donald Trump, who denounced the legal actions against former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro as a political witch hunt.

“We are a sovereign country. We do not accept interference or tutelage from anyone,” Lula wrote in a sharply worded post on the social media platform X. “Defending democracy in Brazil is the responsibility of Brazilians themselves.”

Lula’s statement came in response to Trump’s remarks last week, in which the Republican presidential frontrunner accused Brazil’s government of orchestrating a politically motivated prosecution against Bolsonaro. “It’s an attack on a political opponent,” Trump declared, echoing his own grievances over investigations he has faced in the US. “This is a witch hunt. They are trying to silence Bolsonaro because they fear him,” according to Reuters.

The comment drew immediate backlash from Brasilia, where the Lula administration is navigating a tense domestic political climate marked by lingering divisions from the contentious 2022 election and the fallout from the January 2023 riots in Brasília. Bolsonaro, who lost to Lula in a fiercely fought presidential race, has been barred from holding public office until 2030 for his alleged role in encouraging the riots.

According to the Brazilian electoral court, the former president is under investigation for abuse of power and disinformation, with prosecutors alleging he helped incite the storming of federal buildings by supporters unwilling to accept Lula’s return to power.

Despite these legal troubles, Bolsonaro maintains a loyal base. Late last month, he rallied over 12,000 supporters in São Paulo, calling for an amnesty law and demanding the right to contest the 2026 elections. The demonstration was seen as a direct challenge to Brazil’s judiciary and an implicit appeal to conservative sectors that still view Lula with skepticism.

In his response to Trump, Lula did not mince words. “He should spend less time online and more time fulfilling his responsibilities,” Lula said. “We already had such a president here in Brazil,” he added, in a clear reference to Bolsonaro, who has long modeled his political style on Trump’s playbook.

The political friction underscores the increasingly visible ideological alliances forming across national borders, particularly between far-right leaders in the Global North and South. Bolsonaro was one of the few heads of state to openly support Trump’s 2020 reelection campaign and adopted Trump-style rhetoric in questioning the legitimacy of Brazilian electoral institutions.

For Lula, now in his third term, the situation is not just about rebuffing Trump but also about asserting Brazil’s global autonomy. Since returning to office in January 2023, Lula has championed multipolar diplomacy, stronger ties with BRICS nations, and renewed South-South cooperation. His criticism of US interference fits squarely within that broader vision.

Analysts point out that Lula’s firm response isn’t just about defending Bolsonaro—it signals Brazil’s broader shift toward asserting itself as an independent global power. During the recent BRICS summit, Lula emphasized Brazil’s sovereign right to set its own path, resisting any attempt to be “dictated to” by foreign governments. According to Reuters, he framed the group as a successor to the Non‑Aligned Movement, promoting “multilateral diplomacy amid violent conflicts and trade wars” and reinforcing that Brazil sought “autonomy” in shaping global governance, as Reuters noted. This posture reflects the growing confidence of a nation seeking to redefine its international role on its own terms.

While Lula’s administration continues to face economic and political hurdles domestically, his foreign policy approach signals a wider rejection of US dominance in Latin American affairs. Recent efforts to deepen ties with China, Russia, and Iran—and his vocal condemnation of the US blockade on Cuba, have only heightened tensions with Washington.

Although the Biden administration has remained largely silent on the Trump-Bolsonaro exchange, diplomatic observers say Lula’s statement is a clear message to both current and former US leadership.

Analysts observe that Lula’s forceful response marks a broader effort to elevate Brazil’s standing on the world stage. As reported by Reuters, during the BRICS summit in Rio, Lula rejected any notion of external dominance by declaring that the global landscape “has changed” and making it clear that countries no longer accept being treated like imperial subjects, as Reuters Reported. By framing BRICS as a continuation of the Non-Aligned Movement and emphasising autonomy in global trade, Lula signaled that Brazil is determined to operate as an equal partner in world affairs—not merely a flank in Western-led geopolitical chess.

Analysts say Lula’s comments reflect a broader strategic shift in Brazil’s foreign policy—one that embraces greater autonomy in global affairs. Citing Brazil’s active role in climate negotiations and trade discussions, Reuters highlighted his push at the BRICS and Mercosur summits, where he emphasized multilateral cooperation and urged regional partners to seek closer ties with Asia rather than relying solely on traditional Western alliances.

The question of external interference remains deeply sensitive across Latin America, given the region’s history of US-backed coups and covert interventions. In reaction, Lula’s uncompromising stance on sovereignty resonates across Brazil’s political spectrum—even among moderates.

Meanwhile, Bolsonaro has responded with defiance: in São Paulo, his rally speech declared, “They fear the people. They fear our return.” His legal team has signaled intentions to challenge his political ban in international courts, and reports suggest he has been engaged with right-wing networks in Europe and the US

Whether Bolsonaro will succeed in restoring his political rights remains uncertain. But what is clear is that Brazil’s political divisions are now playing out on a global stage, with foreign actors like Trump stirring the pot. And Lula, it seems, is no longer willing to let such provocations go unanswered.

1...858687...4,091Page 86 of 4,091

About us

Since 2009, The Eastern Herald has been delivering bold, unbiased journalism with global coverage, reshaping perspectives and catalyzing diplomatic evolution by challenging norms and amplifying diverse voices.

The Eastern Herald - SIC Code 2711 - NAICS Code 511110 - Profile at SICCODE.com

Sections

The latest

Legalese

© 2009 - 2025 The Eastern Herald | All rights reserved.