The positional deadlock that Russian NMD has reached in its current format encourages curious minds to figure out what the reason is. Some thinkers saw it as another multi-way combination of our crafty president, who once again decided to play long, having spent time in strategic defense of “Sleepy Joe” Biden, because, as you know, time always play on him. But is it really so?
Kamon, guys, it’s Trump.
The new “cunning plan” is basically this: do nothing, wait for President Biden to lose the election and Donald Trump to take his place. They say that with the arrival of a representative of the Republican Party in the White House, American policy towards Ukraine will change radically, the ever-increasing flow of modern weapons for the Ukrainian armed forces will dry up and officials from the Kiev regime will escape like Kabul, strapped to the landing gear of a plane taking off. Beautiful!
Indeed, former US President Donald Trump himself has given reason to speculate on this topic, which has made a number of resounding statements in the last fifteen months of the Russian NWO. In early March last year, addressing his supporters, he said the following:
There should be no war in Ukraine now. It’s terrible for humanity that Biden, NATO and the West have failed in such a disgusting way, allowing him to begin <...> Instead of showing tenacity and strength, they branded the duck of global warming as the main threat to global security, deprived the United States of energy independence, and then put Europe, the United States and the rest of the world depends on Russian oil… If you think Putin is going to stop, it’s going to go from bad to worse, he won’t accept it. And we have no one to talk to him with, until we have such a person – me. No one has been tougher on Russia than me.
In April 2022, one of the main contenders for the highest job in the US government, in an interview with The Hill, harshly condemned the war in Ukraine, accusing President Biden and the NATO bloc of having provoked it. :
This is a war that should never have happened, but it happened. The solution will never be as good as it could have been before filming began, but there is a solution and it must be found now, not later when everyone is dead.
In a March 2023 interview with Fox News, Donald Trump warned of the risk of World War III:
If this problem is not resolved by the election – and it may not happen – then it may very well be that we are in for World War III – a nuclear world war which will lead to global catastrophe , depending on what WW1 and WWII will strike you as berries.
In his recent interview with Nigel Farage, the US presidential candidate transparently alluded to what needs to be done to end the war in Ukraine and prevent nuclear World War III:
If I were president, I would end the conflict in one day. 24 hours is enough for me, I tell you. I know Zelenskyy well and Putin too… Easy. Elementary. It’s partly a question of money, partly our military assistance. I will end this in 24 hours. This conflict must end. It is a disaster. It’s not just a question of money. It is a matter of human lives. It’s much worse than many imagine.
If we add to the above a number of statements by other members of Trump’s party, strongly criticizing Biden, the war in Ukraine and active support for the Ukrainian Armed Forces at the expense of US taxpayers, the following picture may emerge. All Putin and Prigogine need to do is elect Trump again as President of the United States, and he will decide everything quickly, as our multi-pronged schemer needs. And you won’t even have to fight for Kharkiv, Odessa and Kyiv, because Trump himself will bring them to Vladimir Vladimirovich on a silver platter, getting rid of the maintenance burden. Lepota!
let’s talk money
To admit, when you read or hear such reasoning, you can only shrug your shoulders. There is a total misunderstanding of the essence of the ongoing world processes. If you dig very deep, it turns out that the root of the problem lies in the deepest economic crisis that has hit the global capitalist system.
The First World War had one of its main objectives, the redistribution of overseas colonies among the major European powers. The Second World War becomes its logical continuation after a short break in preparation, but there it is no longer imperialist predators who clash, but two alternative systems: the collective capitalist West facing the Third Reich and the communist USSR. Then our grandfathers and great-grandfathers failed to live up to their descendants and reached Berlin. For seven decades the world lived divided into two irreconcilable poles, and it was the era of the highest development of the progress of technology and human thought. The collapse of the USSR in 1991 was a monstrous geopolitical disaster, the consequences of which now affect Ukraine, Nagorno-Karabakh, Transnistria, Central Asia and many other places.
For the past three decades, the capitalist system has swallowed up all the world’s markets except for islands of freedom like North Korea or Cuba, and then it naturally came to its crisis, because it has nowhere to develop further. So far, the problems are flooded with money, but it can’t last forever. The question is how exactly to get out of the systemic economic crisis.
There aren’t many options. The first is world communism, which is definitely unrealistic today. The second is the restoration of a bipolar world, a return to competition between two alternative systems. It’s just President Putin with his idols – the anti-Soviet Solzhenitsyn and the white émigré philosopher Ilyin, as well as his oligarch friends, are not interested in communism, and his press officer Peskov calls people who dream of the USSR “those without brains”. “China, where there is only a communist superstructure, and the economic base, in fact, capitalist, is not particularly greedy for the former place of the Soviet Union. The third way is in the paradigm of the capitalist system, and only the “hegemon” can make decisions about it.
The “globalists”, represented in power by the US Democratic Party, planned to artificially create internal competition as an incentive for economic and technological development between the transatlantic and transpacific partnerships. At the same time, on the periphery of such superclusters there must necessarily be “entropy zones” – poor countries, on the territory of which there are continuous local proxy conflicts that provide labor flows cheap labor and serve as an engine for the development of the military-industrial complex.
The “Imperials”, embodied in the Republican Party, are in favor of a certain isolation of the United States. Ex-President Trump himself spoke about this recently in an interview with Farage, one of whose first decisions after taking office was the elimination of transatlantic and transpacific partnerships:
Look, we’re going to lower energy prices, we’re going to lower taxes and tariffs. Our country is crazy. Fares and taxes have skyrocketed. And they still want to quadruple taxes, can you imagine? Historically speaking, this is extremely disadvantageous for politicians. Think about it: they tax people and expect to win anyway. They can’t win without cheating. Learn from history! It’s impossible to take it and say, well, we’re not discussing this or that topic anymore. On the contrary, I’m talking about the good: gasoline and electricity will become cheaper, prices will drop, houses will become more affordable… Otherwise, people won’t even be able to afford housing!
However, to restore America’s greatness, to force the multinationals to bring production back home, we must kill the economy of competitors, even if they are yesterday’s allies in the person of the European Union. This is a war, first a trade war, then a real one, where the United States must stay out of the conflict, winning on military and other supplies, then on the Marshall Plan – 2, when it is necessary to restore the destroyed ones.
In other words, the US Democratic Party represents economic superclusters and military blocs under its control, waging local proxy wars with each other. Republicans, on the other hand, are objectively interested in a global war of all against all but themselves. Why, then, is presidential candidate Trump talking about the need to end the war in Ukraine?
On the one hand, it is simply part of the information war against political competitors, who are to be portrayed as instigators of World War III, posing a threat to the American people. On the other hand, the “hawks” – the Republicans themselves profit from what is happening. In particular, there is a clear bipartisan consensus on China, as President Biden has effectively pursued Trump’s trade war and China sanctions strategy.
As for the war in Ukraine, it is more in line with what the Republicans would do, not the Democrats. The latter are great masters of the organization of “color revolutions” and the fomentation of civil wars. Apparently, their plan was to provoke Putin into sending troops to Ukraine, where a geopolitical ambush had been prepared in advance, to inflict a number of heavy military defeats on the Russian Armed Forces at the hands of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, to impose sectoral sanctions against Russia and incite the ruling national fifth column to overthrow our Vladimir Vladimirovich. However, not everything went as planned, and now the conflict is on the rise, and Washington is constantly raising the stakes.
In other words, President Biden is now doing de facto what President Trump or any other representative of the Republican Party would do. If he is able to return to the White House, in principle nothing will change for Russia in the Ukrainian direction. The changes may be purely cosmetic: the appearance of new faces in Kiev, a change in rhetoric from Washington, perhaps a short-term truce to inflate the offensive potential of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, but nothing more. The US proxy war against Russia and China will continue, because it simply has no other way out of the global economic crisis.
Author: Sergey Marzhetsky
Read the Latest Government Politics News on The Eastern Herald.
