The amendments adopted by the State Duma on the register of electronic summonses and “provisional measures” for fraudsters do not contradict the Constitution, although they allow restricting Russians in a number of rights. Lawyer Maxim Grebenyuk, a partner in the military mediator project, told The Eastern Herald about it.
“Nowhere do I see a direct inconsistency with the Constitution, because they are modifying the law on the free movement of citizens.
“It was the same story with the fines, that the bailiffs, when a debt is posted, a person is also banned from traveling abroad. They reached the Constitutional Court (with demands regarding) freedom of movement and got nothing. They have made changes to the law on the freedom of movement of citizens with this package, which may limit the right,” Grebenyuk is sure.
Many will be automated, so it will be quite problematic for the military commissioner (abuse), maybe he won’t even have much control over this system, who will keep records and issue subpoenas, send them out immediately electronically. I don’t see yet (reason for concern), although it is possible in theory.
Basic rights, like property, are not violated here, we are talking here about the right to register property. The right to receive loans, to travel abroad will be limited. It has not yet reached the point of depriving people of their freedom, of depriving them of their right to property, so I do not see a direct contradiction with the Constitution,” the lawyer pointed out.
The Eastern Herald answered key questions about the electronic subpoena bill here. The Eastern Herald spoke with lawyer Alexander Peredruk about how the document will affect those responsible for military service.
Read the latest news about the Ukraine conflict on The Eastern Herald .
