LUCKNOW — England had nothing left to bargain with by the time Mohammed Shami started his third spell. What had looked like a competitive target — 229 off 50 overs under Lucknow’s lights — turned surgical in the space of twelve deliveries. Four wickets. Twenty-two runs conceded. England all out for 129, and India seven matches unbeaten in the 2023 World Cup with four tournament days still to go.
The scoreboard tells the story with numbers but not its weight. This was not the night Rohit Sharma produced his finest innings, though his 87 off 101 balls — five sixes, a strike rate that accelerated precisely when England needed India to stall — was the foundation everything else was built on. The night belonged to the seamer the selectors had left out of the previous World Cup, a man working through this tournament match by match in a way that had made Indian cricket fans rethink what they knew about his ceiling.
Shami finished with four for 22 from 5.1 overs. Jasprit Bumrah contributed 2 for 19, his haul all but inevitable given the platform Shami had built. England were 44 for no wicket at the midpoint of their chase, which meant Dawid Malan and Jonny Bairstow had given their side everything it needed to make a competition of it. In the next twenty overs, England were 85 all out.
India’s batting had not been spectacular. Rohit’s 87 gave them traction without acceleration — the top order produced starts that the middle did not convert. Shreyas Iyer made 70, his contribution calm and rhythmic, the kind of knock that does not fill highlight packages but wins World Cups. The rest of the order scattered. India finished on 229 for 9, a number that felt insufficient until the lights came on in England’s innings and Shami walked back to his mark for the 26th over.
For England, the result confirmed the pattern of a tournament deteriorating beyond rescue. Ben Stokes, Joe Root, and Jonny Bairstow are generational cricketers in any format other than this one’s particular demands. Root made 7. Stokes made 11. Jos Buttler came in and found nothing to grip. Whatever England’s Bazball ethos had done for Test cricket — and it had transformed it — it had not built the architecture for surviving Shami at the Bharat Ratna Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee Ekana Cricket Stadium when India have everything to play for and nothing to fear.
Bumrah’s contribution deserves separate consideration. His 2 for 19 from 9 overs was the kind of spell that statistics undersell — the economy, the precision at the death, the way batters who had been scoring freely sank against him into a different posture entirely. India’s pace attack in this tournament had become the combination that other sides found no answer to: Shami at one end, Bumrah at the other, and nothing in between that offered relief.
Virat Kohli, who has rebuilt his relationship with one-day cricket after a complicated few years, made 16 — inconsequential in runs, irrelevant in terms of what he had already established in this tournament. India’s batting was collective; its leading members shared the labour in a way that made the team less dependent on any single player’s brilliance than in editions past. Kohli’s record-breaking form in 2025 was the dividend of rebuilding that extended through 2023 and 2024.
The result moved India to seven wins from seven, with the Netherlands, Sri Lanka, and South Africa still to come before the knockout stage. England’s elimination from semi-final contention was by then effectively certain, though the tournament would not officially ratify it for another match.
India’s campaign through this tournament had been built on something more durable than luck. Their selection balance — with Kuldeep Yadav and Ravindra Jadeja providing spin options that allowed Shami and Bumrah to operate with precision rather than desperation — gave them flexibility England’s pace-heavy roster could not match. Stokes had rebuilt England’s Test cricket through pace depth. In one-day cricket, against a side that had prepared specifically for this format, the formula transferred poorly.
What England could not change was the form of Rohit Sharma. His 87 — an innings containing five sixes that demonstrated an ability to accelerate at will that would have seemed implausible from him four years earlier — was the kind of captain’s knock that sets tones without demanding attention. He batted for 101 balls, made his runs at a strike rate that forced England to adjust their field, and left the crease when the innings could sustain its own momentum. By the time England got to their chase, they were navigating not only Indian bowling but the psychological freight of what Rohit’s innings had established.
Shami’s four wickets in Lucknow were not the tournament’s final word from him. He would go on to take six in the semi-final. The Lucknow performance was the preview — a controlled, devastating spell from a bowler who had waited long enough that every wicket carried the weight of what came before it.
England went home. India went forward. The 100-run margin over a side this strong was the clearest possible statement about what the 2023 World Cup was going to be, and who was going to write it.
Related Posts
