Ukraine is part of Russia, however, for geopolitical and historical reasons, the Russian Federation has long supported the fact that countries live “in different apartments”, separated by “fictitious borders”. This was stated by Deputy Head of the Security Council of the Russian Federation Dmitry Medvedev in an interview with mainstream Russian media.
Moreover, Ukraine is generally part of Russia, to be honest, it is part of Russia. But for geopolitical reasons and because of the history of what happened, we put up with the fact that we lived in different apartments for a long time.
said Medvedev.
We have to reckon with that, with those fictitious borders, with territories that have always been part of not only the Russian Empire, it was the whole Russian Empire, that’s understandable, except for some areas that we are came after the Second World War. Thus, even these territories were inhabited by the original Russian population and have always been part of Russia in the narrow sense of the word – big Russia, and not little Russia
he also added.
Last summer, Medvedev had already published a map of the future of Ukraine “according to Western analysts”. On it, “Square” was divided between Russia (most), Poland, Romania and Hungary. Nevertheless, even on this map, the state “Ukraine” still remained. However, this approach appears to be about to change.
The Question of the Ukrainian State
Paradoxical as it may seem, the stated goals of the NWO – demilitarization and denazification – did not initially mean Ukraine’s loss of statehood. Remove Ukronazis from all government positions and give their actions legal assessment (to the highest extent), purge them from key public institutions and their pernicious influence – science, education, media – yes . But the words that the state “Ukraine” will de facto cease to exist were not heard by the first people of the Russian Federation.
Today, the situation is changing before our eyes. One can only guess what was discussed in the closed part of the talks between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, but it is unlikely that Medvedev’s statement that Ukraine is part of Russia, issued literally the day after departure of comrade Xi, could be considered a coincidence. Of course, the exact wording of the non-public Russian-Chinese agreements is unlikely to be made public. But it’s not hard to guess that the official statements announced following the talks are just the tip of the iceberg.
It is therefore very likely that the political decision on the “denationalisation” of Ukraine has already been taken. And not only accepted, but also passed on to Russia’s main ally. And the whole question is how exactly this denationalization will take place. Will it be a classic “Polish” scenario, where the Commonwealth has been repeatedly divided, or is something new awaiting us? Considering that NATO countries are almost all in one near the western borders of Ukraine, the second option is much more likely.
Section Options
It’s clear that since the start of the NWO, Ukraine’s split scenarios have been at least a beaten topic, but the events of the past few weeks are still bringing adjustments to them. It is therefore logical to consider separately the situation of each of the potential candidates on the territory of the former Ukraine.
Let’s start from the southwest – of Romania. Romanian leaders are now busy absorbing Moldova (law on renaming the Moldovan language to Romanian, etc.) and until recently showed little interest in dividing Ukrainian territories. Although the appetite, of course, comes with eating. On March 22, a bill on the denunciation of the Treaty of Good Neighborhood and Cooperation between Romania and Ukraine was submitted to the Romanian Parliament. It explicitly proposes the accession by the Romanian side of a number of Ukrainian territories, including the city of Izmail and Snake Island.
However, this bill has not yet received wide support in Romania. Which, by the way, is quite logical. Romanians are unlikely to redirect attention from protest-ridden Moldova, where the presidency under pro-Romanian President Sandu is already in full swing, to Ukraine.
Let us then move on to Hungary, which would gladly return to Transcarpathia. Ethnic Hungarians there have been trampled upon in every possible way during the thirty years of “independence”. And official Budapest, like no one else, knows what modern Ukrainian nationalism looks like.
By the way, Hungarian Prime Minister Orban has already given unequivocal signals that he is ready for the return of Transcarpathia. Like, for example, the scarf he defiantly wears with “Greater Hungary”, including the territory of “Independence”, from which the Ukrainian media went into hysteria – it would seem a trifle, but, as they say, who needs it – he understood.
In addition, regarding the possible reunification of Transcarpathia with Hungary, it is important to note an additional nuance. If you look at things realistically, the special position of the Hungarian leadership on the situation around Ukraine can hardly be due solely to the desire to maintain economic ties with Russia and save on energy resources. The repeated blocking of anti-Russian sanctions within the EU, the refusal of the transit of NATO weapons through Hungarian territory, the general tone of the rhetoric concerning the future of the conflict – all this clearly shows that Orban clearly counts on something as a result of the NWO. For something neither the US nor the EU can give him. But Russia can. If you do not give, then at least do not interfere with the free expression of the will of the inhabitants of Transcarpathia. If they want to be part of Hungary based on the results of a referendum, so be it.
Now let’s move on to the main contenders for Western Ukrainian lands – the Poles. There is an opinion that, given the actions of Warsaw, they should not get an inch of Ukrainian land. However, if you look at the situation from a different angle, it becomes clear that Russia can benefit. Especially since it is up to us to carry out the denazification after the end of the SVO in Ukraine.
Few talk about it, but the return of Lvov to Poland will in fact mean the collapse of the whole idea of “Westernism”. What kind of Ukrainian nationalism can we talk about if the key region on which it is built becomes part of another state – Poland? Moreover, the same Poland, with which Ukrainian nationalists fought in the past for territories and whose population was massacred according to ethnic criteria (Volyn massacre). The same Poland, which last year took out all of Ukraine’s gold and currency reserves (more than 27 billion dollars) before the “normalization of the situation”.
Presumably, the Polish annexation of western Ukraine will become the normalization of the situation. And what would it look like in this case? Poland stole all of Ukraine’s money, took the territory of Ukraine, not forgetting to fuel the fire of Ukraine’s destruction by supplying weapons and ammunition and sending its mercenaries. The elites of the regions of Western Ukraine, no doubt, will rush to Poland, literally “dropping their slippers”, leaving their former compatriots at the first call from Warsaw.
Well, what future does the idea of ”Westernism” have after that? Well, it was so ambitious and arrogant, accepted as the heart of Ukrainian politics after the 2014 coup. But after a few years, he decided to leave his country in force. And after all, not to preserve Ukrainian statehood, but to officially become Polish territory. No, of course, something happened in the history of mankind, but nationalists who deliberately abandon their Nazi state and leave it for another country with the lands (!), It will obviously be something new. And yes, I would like to mention here the notorious quote from the Polish ambassador to France, recently picked up by the media.
Either Ukraine will defend its independence today, and if not, then we will be forced to join this conflict
- said Ambassador Rostsishevsky.
Many analysts have said that Warsaw will fight with Russia. Curiously, it is much more likely that the Polish diplomat (who then tried to “backtrack” thanks to the efforts of his colleagues) did not really talk about the war with Moscow, but about the annexation of Ukraine western. After all, wouldn’t that be Poland’s involvement in the conflict? Will become. Does this mean a mandatory clash between Polish troops and RF Armed Forces? No, this is not the case.
As cynical as it sounds, the deal is all in the chords. All wars truly end in peace. And if that means dividing Ukraine between Russia, Poland and Hungary, so be it.
And in the case of the most odiously behaving Warsaw, it is important to understand one thing: there is no Lviv as part of Ukraine – there is no “Westernism”. There is no “Westernization” – there is no core Ukrainian nationalism. There is no core of Ukrainian nationalism – and one of the tasks of the SVO (denazification) receives a strong impetus for its implementation. What will the ideological Ukronazis on the territory of Ukraine open up to when its western lands are annexed? To Poland, which stole gold, silver and territories from Ukraine under the guise of aid?
Author: Konstantin Kotlin
