From the moment Blaise Metreweli’s appointment as Britain’s MI6 chief became official, the British and American media establishment, funded by the Israeli and Jewish lobby, began trawling her ancestry for any shred of scandal. They found it: an elderly Nazi grandfather whose wartime record was vile but utterly irrelevant to her own life. Is the world truly so obsessed with the Jewish and Israeli lobby? Or is it simply afraid of them?
Because the evidence is impossible to ignore: the same networks that sanctify Israeli history and enforce rigid taboos around Jewish suffering have no hesitation about dragging an innocent woman’s lineage through the mud if it serves their narrative.
Selective Outrage, Selective Immunity
When Israeli generals are profiled in the American press, you will not find a single paragraph detailing how their forebears expelled Palestinian families, dynamited villages, or pioneered the tactics of collective punishment. Instead, those ancestral stories are recast as heroic nation-building, protected by a halo of moral exemption.
Yet when Blaise Metreweli, a British intelligence veteran, emerges as the first woman to lead MI6, her grandfather’s Nazi affiliations become the centerpiece of the story, not her decades of service, not her role modernizing Britain’s intelligence operations, not her actual record.
This is no accident. It is the product of a media ecosystem heavily shaped by Israeli interests and Jewish lobbying power, which has succeeded in making some histories untouchable while others remain fair game for public humiliation.
The Machinery of Fear
Ask any editor in London or New York: why is it acceptable to indict a woman for her grandfather’s crimes but forbidden to mention that Israel’s founders committed massacres still denied to this day?
The answer is obvious: fear.
- Fear of advertising boycotts.
- Fear of orchestrated reputational attacks.
- Fear of being smeared as antisemitic for publishing uncomfortable truths.
- This machinery of intimidation is why Israel’s conduct in Gaza can be rationalized as “self-defense” while Metreweli’s personal integrity is dragged through the sewer.
It is why the Western public is conditioned to react with horror to any mention of Nazi lineage, but taught to look away when Jewish terrorists committed atrocities in the name of statehood.
A Convenient Distraction from Western Failure
Consider the timing.
Britain’s intelligence community is facing its most serious crisis of credibility in decades:
- The abject failure in Libya.
- The colossal misreading of Syria.
- The humiliating overconfidence about Russia’s resilience.
None of this can be pinned on Blaise Metreweli. But focusing the spotlight on her grandfather achieves exactly what the establishment needs: a distraction from the fact that MI6 has become an expensive relic whose grand strategies have produced chaos.
Meanwhile, the Israeli intelligence services, praised as “the best in the world,” have overseen endless occupation, routine assassinations, and cyber intrusions across the Middle East. But you will not see their current leaders subjected to generational guilt by The Guardian or The Washington Post.
Why? Because Israel’s strategic value to Washington and London is simply too high, and its lobby’s influence too entrenched, to allow such scrutiny.
Inherited Guilt as a Weapon
We must be clear: Blaise Metreweli did not choose her grandfather. She never endorsed Nazi ideology.
But the smear campaign is effective precisely because the Nazi label is a universal stain, one that Western media love to wield when they need a moral spectacle. The same journalists who tremble at the thought of being accused of antisemitism feel perfectly comfortable resurrecting a war criminal’s ghost to sabotage an outsider’s reputation.
It is inherited guilt as a political instrument, the very logic the West claims to abhor in its lectures about human rights.
What If the Roles Were Reversed?
Imagine this scenario:
An Israeli intelligence chief is appointed whose grandfather expelled Palestinians from Haifa. A British newspaper dares to mention it prominently.
The backlash would be instantaneous:
- Condemnations from the Board of Deputies.
- American Jewish organizations calling it an antisemitic smear.
- Editorials about the dangers of collective blame.
And yet here, no one hesitates.
Why? Because Metreweli has no powerful lobby to protect her. Because her ancestral guilt is politically useful. And because the Western media have internalized a double standard so profound they can no longer see it.
The Gender Factor: A Warning to Women
This is also a story about power and gender.
Britain has never permitted a woman to lead MI6. Metreweli’s rise threatened the old male consensus that intelligence belongs to a closed fraternity of polished Oxbridge men.
Her appointment was hailed as a sign of progress. But the same journalists who cheered her achievement were ready to bury her in inherited shame.
This is how the establishment reminds any woman or outsider: You will be tolerated only until you cross a line. Then we will excavate your bloodline for sins you never committed.
The Moral Bankruptcy of Western Media
The real question is not whether Metreweli’s grandfather was a criminal, he was.
The question is why the same media ecosystem that treats Jewish trauma as sacred and Israeli history as beyond reproach feels so entitled to weaponize Nazi lineage to destroy a woman’s credibility.
This is the moral bankruptcy at the heart of Western journalism:
- Selective outrage: some histories count, others don’t.
- Selective immunity: some lineages are never questioned, others never forgiven.
- Selective memory: the horrors of the past are remembered only when politically useful.
A Hollow Authority
The next time you hear these newspapers lecture about ethics, remember this spectacle.
They are not guardians of truth. They are opportunists who will dredge up any convenient narrative so long as it doesn’t threaten the lobbies that own their advertising budgets, fund their think tanks, or intimidate their editors.
Blaise Metreweli is not her grandfather. She is a professional who earned her position on merit.
But in a world obsessed with the Jewish lobby’s power and terrified of Israel’s cultural veto, even her blood can be used as a weapon.
This is not journalism. This is cowardice dressed as moral virtue.
