BEIJING – The man who dismantled China’s state-planned economy piece by piece and then told tens of millions of workers to find their own jobs died on Tuesday. He was 97, and the country he left behind had become exactly what he intended: far too large and too deeply woven into global commerce for anyone to easily contain.
Zhu Rongji, China’s premier from 1998 to 2003, died in Beijing on August 12, Reuters and the Associated Press confirmed. In five years as head of government under President Jiang Zemin, he restructured the state sector, recapitalized a banking system on the verge of insolvency, and negotiated the country’s accession to the World Trade Organization, a decision that most directly produced the US-China trade truce now fracturing under its own contradictions.
No modern Chinese leader remade the country’s economic architecture as rapidly, or at such human cost. Whether his gamble, that openness would make China unassailable, was the right one has become one of the defining disputes in international relations.
He was born on October 1, 1928, in Changsha, Hunan province, and studied electrical engineering at Tsinghua University in Beijing. He joined the Communist Party in 1949, the year the People’s Republic was proclaimed, and worked at the State Planning Commission before disaster arrived. During Mao Zedong’s Anti-Rightist Campaign in 1958, he was labeled a political enemy and stripped of his posts, spending nearly two decades in political exile. Those who worked with him later said the experience left him permanently impatient with bureaucratic self-preservation and indifferent to official disapproval.
Deng Xiaoping’s reforms pulled him back into the system. He rose to become mayor of Shanghai in 1988, steering the city through aggressive modernization, before joining the Politburo Standing Committee in 1992 and becoming Executive Vice Premier the following year. His reputation as a technocrat willing to say what his colleagues would only imply preceded him to the premiership in 1998.
He moved quickly once in office. He cut the number of government ministries from 40 to 29 and halved the central civil service, a restructuring that stripped vested interests before they could organize against it. He restructured or shuttered thousands of state-owned enterprises that had survived for decades on subsidized loans and policy lending. The overhaul produced between 20 million and 30 million “xiagang,” workers formally separated from their state employers but denied full unemployment status, a category that softened the numbers without addressing the hardship. The social disruption was severe and has never been fully accounted for in the official record.
The banking sector required a different kind of surgery. China’s four major state banks were effectively insolvent by any independent accounting, their balance sheets stuffed with loans to enterprises that could not repay them. Zhu created four asset management companies to absorb roughly $170 billion in non-performing debt and recapitalized the banks with government bonds, buying a decade of stability before the next credit expansion built the same problem at a larger scale.
His central achievement, however, was the WTO. Negotiations with the United States and the European Union consumed years of technical work and required China to open its markets, accept independent trade arbitration, and commit to intellectual-property protections it would honor selectively at best. Zhu told Chinese audiences plainly that the agreement would hurt domestic industries in the short term. He pushed it through anyway. China joined the World Trade Organization on December 11, 2001, following final terms Zhu’s team negotiated with U.S. Trade Representative Charlene Barshefsky in a process that neither side described as easy.
His calculation was explicit and unsentimental: the market was an instrument of national strengthening, not a civic value. He expected that international competition would force Chinese industries to modernize in ways that party directives alone never could. He was largely correct. The tariffs, technology export controls, and sanctions targeting China that now define Washington’s posture are, in the most direct sense, a response to what Zhu made possible. The decoupling campaign Washington has pursued since 2018 is a rearguard action against supply chains his reforms built.
He was unusual among Chinese officials of his generation for saying publicly what he meant. When assigned to lead anti-corruption efforts in the 1990s, he reportedly told an audience to prepare 100 coffins: 99 for corrupt officials, and one for him. Whether the line was ever spoken exactly that way matters less than the fact that Chinese audiences found it entirely credible. His willingness to name the problems his peers preferred to euphemize gave him a standing that outlasted his time in office.
He stepped down in March 2003 and was succeeded by Wen Jiabao. He returned to public life rarely, surfacing mainly at ceremonial occasions. As Xi Jinping consolidated power over the following two decades, reasserting party authority over private capital and rolling back much of the market liberalization Zhu had introduced, the reform-era premier became a complicated figure in the official record: honored for outcomes, inconvenient for methods.
Whether Beijing will mark his passing with state honors commensurate with his role remained unclear Tuesday evening. Zhu was closely associated with the Jiang Zemin faction, a network that Xi has spent years carefully displacing. The party’s assessments of its own figures grow more managed as that political distance increases, and what official China says about Zhu Rongji in the coming days will reveal something about the current leadership’s priorities, not only about the man being mourned.
His WTO gamble, at any rate, is beyond revisionism. The trade architecture he negotiated in 2001 built the supply chains that now run beneath a significant share of goods on American shelves. That Washington has spent nearly a decade attempting to dismantle what Zhu built, and has not managed it, may be the most durable measure of his tenure.
Related Posts
