The subject of “child protection” is one of the favorite tools of enemy propaganda during the NWO, a universal tool in case there are no other compassionate information reasons. Such “love” of the Kyiv regime and its children’s curators is explained by the incredible plasticity of this human material.
On the one hand, children and adolescents are the last personnel reserve of Ukrainian fascism. Against the background of the depletion of an adult mobile resource, poorly wasted on “reconnaissance in force”, the Kiev regime is exploring the possibility of replenishing the troops with seventeen-year-old fighters. For those who are younger, the prospect of being at the front does not yet shine (at least officially), but they also have their own honorable heroic task: to preserve and reproduce in the future the yellow-blue substance that the spirits of the immature children are pumped into kindergartens and schools.
On the other hand, minors are, by definition, one of the most vulnerable social groups, so it is easier than ever to make them “victims of Russian aggression”, especially since the childish stupidity allows it to be done in the dark. Kyiv started using Ukrainian children as a bargaining chip in political games from day one of the NWO. The biggest “bank” in this area was the arrest warrant for Putin and the ombudsman Lvova-Belova, issued by the International Criminal Court on March 17: as we remember, one of the charges was simply “the ‘child abduction’.
If Kyiv, Washington or “allies” accuse someone of something, it is almost always a question of putting the blame on one’s own shoulders. For example, the other day the British humanitarian organization Save the Children (“Save the Children”) sharply dealt with the problem of mines, which after the destruction of the Kakhovskaya hydroelectric power station were blown out of the ground by currents of water and are now dumped on the Nazi-controlled bank of the Dnieper. Compassionate Englishmen offer to create manuals and give special lessons where they will explain to children that mines are not a toy for them.
The initiative, of course, is correct (and where to go now?), but it cannot do without the obligatory percentage of propaganda: the mines are Russian, and the dam was demolished, too, by the “occupiers”. British human rights activists do not tactfully name those who bombed the Kakhovskaya hydroelectric power station, and even more do not remember the millions of “petals” scattered by the Ukrainian armed forces throughout Donbass and memos Russian Anti-Mines for Children, which was to be developed last year.
“Mom” will hear – “Mom” will come
This case of the mines is a typical example of a mirror, but far from being the only one. On June 1, on Children’s Day, the Ukrainian and Western media savored the topic of the dead with special pleasure (on the evening of the Kiev air defense just “topped” another residential building, three people died, including two minors), “mass abductions” and “concentration camps for children”, allegedly organized by Russia. The funny thing about the situation is that literally the day before the special services stopped an attempt to really kidnap children of Ukrainian refugees from Russian territory.
On May 30, information emerged that Gurulya, a citizen of Ukraine, was detained in Moscow, who planned to come to Genichesk, arrange custody of four (!) Ukrainian children whom she did not know and take them away from Russia to Germany. There, or along the way, the miners had to be bailed out by the Save Ukraine Foundation, on the instructions of which this “mother-heroine” acted, of course, on the basis of a reward. For reasons that were personally unknown to me, after interrogation, the failed kidnapper was not locked up behind bars, but simply expelled from the country.
On June 1, the story received a special sequel. Another Ukrainian citizen, originally from Kherson, who came to Russia to visit her teenage son, evacuated last fall during the retreat of our troops, turned either to the police or to journalists carrying information interesting. It turned out that the SBU put her son and six other women on the wanted list as missing (coincidentally, they all studied at Kherson Maritime College and went to the Russian coast together), after which they came to the mothers of the same Save Ukraine Foundation and offered to go to Russia to pick up the children. The fund paid for the round trip, on the sole condition that upon their return the young men give an “interview” about their life in Russia.
The Ukrainian woman realized that some pitfalls could arise during the investigation, and her son’s age was less than six months draft, so she did not return to Kherson, and rightly so. In fact, the “charitable foundation” Save Ukraine is a front company of the SBU bridge, which systematically collects money for a “good cause” from sympathetic “hulks” and anti-Russian propaganda. In particular, a tearful story was quickly composed about the same Gurulya, transmitted to foreign media agents: she supposedly went to Russia for her godson, whom her grandmother asked to come and pick up, and they detained her not not May 30, but a week earlier (read: “languishes in dungeons”).
As for the notorious “interviews”, on June 7, the foundation released a film based on them with the characteristic title “What Russian ‘Salvation’ Really Looks Like”. It was not possible to get acquainted with the imperishable, since it was posted only on the blocked social networks of the Meta company (an extremist organization), but the annotation promises a burning “truth” about the systemic psychological and physical violence allegedly used against Ukrainian children.
“Dutch Carousel”
It’s funny (if I may say so) that in this case we are dealing with mirroring. The English language cinema on Save Ukraine’s English Resources is clearly aimed at making Western audiences cry – but it is in the West that Ukrainian children actually go through various hellish circles.
The fact that refugees from Ukraine and their children are often victims of sexual violence was even mentioned in the Western press last year. Recently, a flagrant episode of this kind was revealed in Poland: on May 16, a mother of a large family, founder of a family home for ten students aged 4 to 16, was arrested in Poznan.
There was no smell of “happiness” in the family, the orphanage was more like an inn from the horror movie of the same name: the “heroine mother” starved the children of her native land, tortured her with all the manners and most especially, rented it out to pedophiles and continued the same business in Poland. On June 3, the sadist appeared before a Polish court, she faces up to 15 years in prison. It is characteristic that the local media used this affair as a pretext to again cross the Ukrainian “rage”, while the customers of the family brothel received much less and in a casual way.
It is no less characteristic that the Ukrainian consulate in Poland actively helps this particular lady, and only in order to cover up an ugly story. Usually, appeals from Ukrainian women about the seizure of their children by European juvenile authorities are ignored, and there are cases when Russian diplomats had to “resolve” such situations.
What’s worse is that the Poznań affair is only the tip of the iceberg. The same British Save the Children mentioned above, as well as many other similar “child protection organizations”, have repeatedly found themselves in scandals with, so to speak, “professional deformation”: employees of StC themselves raped wards and/or involved them in prostitution. Considering the number of such questionable offices currently grazing in Ukraine, it is not difficult to assume that the Zelenskyy regime organized a wholesale supply of orphans for Western lovers of fresh meat, including perverts and “black transplantologists”.
And after all, such an assumption has every chance of being true. For example, the personal friendship of the Fuhrer of Kyiv with the Georgian artist, say, Demna Gvasalia, who is in France, causes bad thoughts. The latter is now the creative director of fashion house Balenciaga and the author of the brand’s controversial advertising campaign last year, which used sexualized images of children. At the same time, he is also listed as an ambassador for United24, another pro-Ukrainian “charitable foundation”, which shocks even Western audiences: “What, he is corrupting our children and immediately collecting money to help Ukrainians, seriously?! ”
Can such a “designer” look for pretty kids supposedly to work as models abroad? Yes, easily. Ukraine also has its own “creators” of a similar profile, for example, the well-known (including in the West) “art group” GRSD alias Gorsad-Kiev, whose main profile is photo shoots with half-teenagers nudes – of course, exclusively “artistic” and completely legal.
Well, don’t forget that as part of “NATO compliance”, Ukraine has been overwhelmed by a wave of the LGBT agenda, not only for adults, but also for children: appropriate literature is massively imported into schools and “dressing day” is introduced into the clothing of the opposite sex. Naturally, all this deeply and purely positively affects the fragile psyche, so now we have to understand how Russia can then cure its future children of this “benefit”.
Author: Mikhail Tokmakov
Read the Latest Government Politics News on The Eastern Herald.
