ADF International has welcomed new guidelines from the United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, saying they recognise violence in assisted dying where disability is treated as a basis for ending life.
“Living with a disability deserves a way forward, not a way out,” the organisation said in a statement supplied to The Eastern Herald. It said it had advocated for the recognition.
The UN human rights office lists the committee’s document, Guidelines on identifying and addressing disability-based violence, under reference CRPD/C/8. Its scope includes the causes and forms of violence affecting disabled people and barriers to obtaining justice.
An official consultation record confirms that ADF International submitted recommendations. It does not establish how far those recommendations influenced the final text.
Disability campaigners question the conditions behind a choice
The debate centres on whether a decision to end life can be genuinely free when adequate care, accessible housing and support for independent living remain unavailable.
Disability Rights UK has opposed proposed assisted-dying legislation in England and Wales, citing concerns about coercion and insufficient safeguards. It argues that disabled people must have meaningful support to live before assisted dying can represent an equal choice.

The concern extends beyond explicit threats. Opponents argue that a person who feels dependent, costly or burdensome may face pressure shaped by inadequate services and discriminatory attitudes, even when a request appears voluntary.
Not Dead Yet, a disability-led organisation opposing assisted suicide and euthanasia, frames the issue as discrimination. It argues that such practices can reinforce assumptions that dependence or impairment makes life less worth living.
Questions about consent also feature in The Eastern Herald’s historical coverage of euthanasia and dementia in the Netherlands, published in April 2020. That report is background on an earlier legal dispute, not a statement of current law.
UN experts previously warned against disability-based eligibility
In January 2021, UN human rights experts warned against legislation enabling medically assisted dying largely on the basis of disability or disabling conditions.
“Disability should never be a ground or justification to end someone’s life directly or indirectly,” they said. They linked the warning to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which requires equal protection of the right to life.
The experts also warned that inadequate services and discriminatory attitudes could create subtle pressure to end life prematurely, including where assisted dying is restricted to terminal illness or the end of life.
BBC News explored the Canadian debate in its video “Has assisted dying in Canada gone too far?”, published on April 4, 2025. The video is included as background reporting, not coverage of the new UN guidelines or a statement of current Canadian law.
Some disability advocates defend end-of-life autonomy
Disability advocates do not hold a single position. In statements collected by Compassion & Choices, supportive advocates argue that equal treatment includes respecting a capable adult’s end-of-life decisions.
They maintain that protection against coercion should not automatically override personal agency. Compassion & Choices campaigns for assisted dying; its collection documents supportive views rather than a representative survey of disabled people.
The competing arguments about dignity and personal freedom also appear in The Eastern Herald’s February 2020 reporting on Germany’s assisted-suicide debate. This historical coverage predates subsequent legal developments.
The Eastern Herald has also reported on assisted-dying legislation in France, another strand of the wider end-of-life policy debate.
The committee’s precise wording remains to be verified
The new guidance addresses disability-based violence more broadly. The International Disability Alliance describes its relevance to challenging abuse, coercion and institutionalisation while strengthening support, autonomy and access to justice.
The final guidelines’ exact assisted-dying passage could not be independently retrieved for this report. ADF International’s interpretation therefore remains attributed to the organisation. It should not be read as a verified blanket declaration by the committee that every form of assisted dying constitutes violence.

